Shelfishness

A recent Miss Manners column1 discussed the “appalling”2 practice of shelving books “backwards”, with the spines toward the wall. Despite the column begging the question of using books for decoration to begin with, I was pumping my fist – despite my default reaction to the stuffy old ‘rules’ of etiquette being a good ol’ Bert stare3, I’ll pick cherries like Pac-Man – as I read her excoriation of those who would shelve by color4, until I realized that:

  1. She also derided shelving books based on height, which, well… look at fancy Miss “I Have So Much Wall Space I Don’t Need to Bother Using It Efficiently Or Else I Just Don’t Mind Having Hundreds of Boxes of Books Unshelved in Storage Or I Suppose More Likely Just Don’t Have That Many Books” Manners over here.
  2. And, uh, I currently have books shelved fore-edge out, and can think of at least three (good!) reasons why one might do that…
  1. 5 If you’ve got a to-be-read shelf, it’s a nice way to add in a little bit of day-to-day variety by not knowing exactly what you’re grabbing on your way out the door.
  2. It avoids having to get into the literary equivalent of the whole “RTs ≠ endorsements” morass if someone catches a glimpse of your bookshelves when stopping by, in the background of an unexpected video call, etc.
  3. If you’re in the “just-get-the-shelves-up-and-get-the-books-on-the-shelves-so-they’re-not-on-the-floor-you-can-finish-the-sorting-and-organizing-later” stage of shelving6, it’s an easy way to distinguish books that have been fully catalogued from those that have yet to be processed.7
  1. While I do not peruse Ms. Manners, I do scan across it for certain keywords such as ‘dog’, ‘book’, etc . ↩︎
  2. … because the letter writer was “appalled”, not because I quote the air to disagree. Because I don’t, except that I do, yes-but-actually-no-but-that’s-the-point-of-this-post. ↩︎
  3. Bert - of Bert & Ernie from Sesame Street - looks up slowly from a book to stare at the camera, as Ernie laughs next to him. His stare is flat, hardened, the stare of a man who has seen something that has him recalling fondly the sight of the depths of the abyss. ↩︎
  4. I of course admit the possibility of said books being part of a reference library of cover designs or bindings, or the library of a synaesthete whose mental loci are colors, or managed via an automated scanning & tracking system that allows for the near-instantaneous location of any volume via a pan-tilt laser pointer mounted in the middle of the ceiling, or being intentionally arranged in a non-logical manner so as to foster serendipitous adjacencies, etc. ↩︎
  5. No, I’m not going to bother figuring out how to tidy up the formatting in WordPress’s editor. ↩︎
  6. Coming up on the second decade of that, myself. ↩︎
  7. The same applies, m.m., to stuff like Post-It flags in the margins for things to look up, write out, follow up on, etc. ↩︎

Huh. Would’ve kinda expected that WordPress would’ve treated footnotes… not the same as a numbered list with automatic anchors, apparently, but there ya go.

… which does make it annoying that I don’t seem to be able to footnote my footnotes, because I totally had something for that.

Leave a comment